Votes For Women c1900-28

hesitation 1From cite A a pecker produced in 1912 by the Suffra deceasetes it can spread abroad us one of the cases wherefore the Suffragettes were demanding the choose for wo clobberforce. On the top row, it shows women in super educated, well paid jobs wish well a whitethornor or a nurse, clock below it a row of low-altitude men much(prenominal) as a convict and a drunkard. already here(predicate) we see a stark line of reasoning in their class. It shows us that women of such persona were non exclusivelyowed to take, while men of such low integrity were. A reason why women were non enfranchised was because citizenry deemed them to be inferior and less agile to men. However, what this posters shows us is that women can be more educated, and better respected, yet windlessness non get the vote, unlike the men who didnt complete anything good in life, yet tranquilize got the vote. Also, people criticised the Suffragettes with their violent methods which failed, and accused of universe wild lunatics. What the poster similarly shows is that men could be lunatics, and still gain the votes, save why cant women do so to.Question 2 rise B is an condense from a book written in 1907 called Woman or Suffragette. Its main bet is that women should non be voting, precisely in fact were destined to educate voters. It dis chords with the all in all transaction, both(prenominal) the Suffragists and the Suffragettes. It also has a commendation to the Suffragettes movement, with its shrill cry.Source C on the different hand is a resume drawn in 1906 by Bernard Partridge. It shows two campaigners, one portrayed as a calm, sensible, upper-class char a Suffragist, and the other shown as a crazy and violet woman a Suffragette. It also shows the Suffragette brandishing her fist, showing her violence and the basis if the Suffragettes movement. The cartoon criticises the Suffragette movement, with its shrieking sister, and shows the Su ffragist saying to the Suffragette YOU uphold our cause? Why, youre its worst enemy in that respect is also a reference here, like Source B, to the Suffragettes movement, referring to their shrieking. This shows us that the artificer doesnt detain the Suffragettes violent movement, but does control the Suffragists serene movement.This tells me that Source C doesnt support Source B fully around(predicate) the disagreement of the womens movement, but rather that the womens movement was acceptable when it took a more peaceful approach.Question 3Despite the Suffragette campaign, women still had not gained the vote by the irruption of the fight. Source D an extract of a book written by Emmeline Pankhurst in 1912 shows us that because of the failure to drop woman enfranchised, the Suffragettes wanted the matter to be more widely noticed by the public. Emmeline tell that it succeeded in this because the newspapers argon full of us. This is like a reason for why the Suffragett es were allowed to be violent. Source E on the other hand is a vernacular given by a atom of the sevens just a stratum after Emmeline Pankhursts book was written. It is opposing the conception of women gaining the vote, saying that it will ultimately spew the control of the government activity of this country into womanly hands.This shows us that some members of Parliament opposed the idea of having women in Parliament. Already the sources show us two of the various reasons why women were not given the vote. another(prenominal) is that the Prime Minister at the while Herbert Asquith also opposed womens rights to the vote. This would have influenced Parliament. another(prenominal) reason is the public and their opinion. With the Suffragists before, and their peaceful campaign, it got them the vote in local elections. With the Suffragettes, they got people to be scared of them and threatened the welfare of the others. This I think is the most important reason. To be enfran chised, they needed the publics support, because without this, no-one would support their campaign.Question 4Both Sources F and G are useful to recover out the parcel of women to the state of warfare, both in different ways. Source F is an example of propaganda, made at the time by the government, to try and get women to work in munitions factories, and consequently in the war effort. What this poster doesnt tell us is the occur of women who were running(a) in the munitions factories, but rather that the government allowed women to help in the war effort. In fact, this poster could be telling us that women were vital to the war, and that without women, the war could not have been won. With the women working in factories and doing the jobs that the men did enabled the men to go to war and fight.Also, the poster, with the words Enrol At at one time is suggesting that women should do just that. At the fountainhead of the poster shows a very brawny looking woman, looking like s he enjoyed working in the factories. Most women at the time would be working in scurvy conditions, with little pay and so a poor standard of life. The woman contradicts this, and so makes women want to join up. Also, it shows us that the government wanted to persuade women to work at the factories, and so needed them to be participate in the war. Theres however, no way to live on if the poster succeeded or not.Source F, on the other hand, is a table of statistics, written in the 1980s. This could mean that the data could have been compiled after years of research. Furthermore, as it is produce in a school school text book, it would mean that it should be an unbiased makeup of evidence, unlike the government poster. Although it is a subaltern piece of evidence, you can still find out most the contribution to the war done by women, but not fully. The table only shows us the rate of women employed in certain industries in 1914 and 1918.There s no other information telling us a bout before, during, or after the war. We cannot tell if the number of women working in industries fell or rose during these times. Also, this positive trend may not have happened across all the industries. It also doesnt show us the facts, but, when compared to the demoralize of the war, there was a significant outgrowth in women working in industries, and so the war effort.Overall, I think that Source G is more useful. It provides actual statistics, which enables you to make a conclusion about the amount women did contribute to the war. Source F is provided a poster designed to insert women into munitions factories and shows the governments need for female contribution to the war effort. It doesnt give any indication about the number of women working in munitions factories, let alone the industries.Question 5It was the work that women did during the war during the war that earned them the vote. in person I do not agree with this statement. I feel that it is a five-fold of re asons, not just the war, which enabled women to be enfranchised. nonpareil of the reasons was due to their war effort. In destiny out in the war, they earned peoples respect, both the public and politicians. Also, they should people that there were not crazy, violent women as they were seen before, but in fact sane people. Source H partially agrees with this, as it says that women workers received a warm welcome but not